A chatbot feels weightless. Hao's reporting gives it a map: whose words it learned from, whose hands cleaned it up, and whose water and power keep it running.
LabourWaterA few of the places Hao reports from. HourLife's drawing; the lines are ours.
The core idea
An empire, without the flags.
Karen Hao is a journalist who has covered artificial intelligence for MIT Technology Review and The Wall Street Journal, and who profiled OpenAI years before ChatGPT made it famous. Empire of AI follows the company from its founding as a nonprofit in 2015, through the launch of ChatGPT, to the November 2023 crisis in which its board fired Sam Altman and then took him back days later. Hao argues that the industry OpenAI leads behaves like an empire: it lays claim to data, labour, land, energy and water that are not its own, and justifies the taking with a mission to benefit all of humanity. Drawing on interviews with around 260 people, she sets scenes inside the company beside reporting from the places that carry the costs, including data workers in Kenya and Venezuela and communities fighting data centres in Chile and Uruguay. The book ends by asking how that kind of power could be checked and spread out.
The word is chosen with care. Hao is not saying AI companies conquer territory with armies. She is saying they follow an old pattern: claim what others made, pay the people at the bottom as little as possible, and explain it all with a mission so grand that objecting sounds like standing in the way of progress.
That is why the book moves between two kinds of scene. One is the boardroom and the research lab in San Francisco, where the stakes are described as the future of the species. The other is a labeller's desk in Nairobi or a dry town in Chile, where the stakes are a wage, a night's sleep, a water supply. Hao asks the reader to hold both at once.
i.
It claims what is not its own
Old empires took land and minerals. This one takes writing, art, personal data, and the land, power and water its data centres need.
Now: training data, sites, supply
ii.
It runs on cheap labour
The researchers are paid like stars. The people who label and clean the data are paid by the task, often far away and out of sight.
Now: annotation and moderation
iii.
It tells a civilising story
The taking is framed as a gift: AGI that will benefit all of humanity, if only the right empire gets there first.
Now: the race to AGI
Interactive · what's in a prompt
Follow one prompt back to its sources.
Six stages stand between the world and the answer on your screen. Open each one to see what it takes and who carries the cost, as the book reports it. Tick the questions worth asking, and leave with a list you can use on a vendor, an employer or your local council.
YOUThe answerWhat reaches your screen
Stage 01 of 06Words and art taken from the web
The data
What it takes
Text, images and code gathered from the open web at huge scale: books, articles, forum posts and art, mostly made by people who were never asked.
Who carries the cost
Writers, artists and anyone whose posts became training material, without pay or a say.
What Hao reports
Hao describes how the push to scale turned careful dataset building into taking whatever could be gathered, and how writers and artists have since gone to court and to the picket line over it.
Stage 02 of 06People who label and filter
The labour
What it takes
People who tag data, rank answers and filter out violent and abusive material, so the model behaves when you meet it.
Who carries the cost
Contract workers, often in poorer countries, paid by the hour or by the task, some of them exposed to the worst content online.
What Hao reports
Hao reports on Kenyan workers hired through the outsourcing firm Sama to sort graphic text for an OpenAI content filter, for a few dollars an hour, and on the harm it did to some of them. She also reports how Venezuela's economic collapse pushed educated people into piece-rate labelling work.
Stage 03 of 06Chips, and the money to buy them
The compute
What it takes
Tens of thousands of specialised chips wired into supercomputers, and billions of dollars to pay for them and run them.
Who carries the cost
Everyone outside the few firms that can afford it: universities, independent researchers and smaller rivals, who are priced out of the field.
What Hao reports
Hao reports how OpenAI's need for money to scale led it to add a for-profit arm to the nonprofit in 2019 and to tie itself to Microsoft, and how that shifted what the company was for.
Stage 04 of 06Power for the data centres
The energy
What it takes
Data centres that run day and night and draw large amounts of electricity, much of it still made by burning fossil fuels.
Who carries the cost
People living near the power plants and the data centres, ratepayers when the grid must grow, and the climate everyone shares.
What Hao reports
Hao argues that the race to build ever larger data centres is keeping fossil-fuel power running longer than planned, and that the sites tend to go where local people have the least say.
Stage 05 of 06Fresh water to cool the servers
The water
What it takes
Fresh water to keep the servers cool, sometimes drawn from the same supplies that people drink.
Who carries the cost
Towns in dry regions, where a new data centre competes with homes and farms for the same water.
What Hao reports
Hao follows residents near Santiago in Chile, and in Uruguay, who organised against planned Google data centres while their regions faced drought, and pressed for a say over how their water is used.Hao has since corrected one water figure in the Chile reporting, which the book overstated through a unit error. This page quotes no figures.
Stage 06 of 06Owned by a few, closed to the rest
The model
What it takes
The finished product: owned by a handful of firms, with its training data and much of how it works kept from the public.
Who carries the cost
Users who cannot see inside it, researchers who cannot study it, and a public whose rules are shaped by the firms that build it.
What Hao reports
Hao traces how a lab founded on openness grew more secretive, and how the fight over its direction broke into the open in November 2023, when the board removed Sam Altman and then took him back days later.
Concept anatomy
How the empire feeds itself.
HourLife's drawing of the loop the book describes. A mission justifies a race, the race demands scale, scale needs resources from somewhere, and the power that collects at the centre makes the mission sound more urgent still.
HourLife's diagram. Extraction, in dark, is where the costs in Plate I come from.
I
MissionBuild AGI that benefits all of humanity.
II
RaceSomeone else might get there first, and do it worse.
III
ScaleSo go bigger: more data, more chips, more money.
IV
ExtractionBigger needs labour, land, power and water from somewhere.
V
PowerA few firms end up holding the means and the story.
The road to the board crisis
The outline of the story the book reports, in dates that are on the public record.
2015OpenAI launches as a nonprofit lab, with Sam Altman and Elon Musk among its founders.
2018Musk leaves the board.
2019A for-profit arm is added under the nonprofit, and Microsoft invests.
2022ChatGPT is released in November and spreads faster than anyone inside expected.
2023In November the board removes Altman. Days later he is back, and most of that board is gone.
2025Empire of AI is published.
Two camps, one premise
Hao describes a field split over what AGI will do. Look at what both sides agree on.
The boostersAGI will cure disease, end scarcity and lift everyone. Build it fast.
The doomersAGI could end humanity. Build it carefully, and only the right people should.
Shared premise: AGI is near and decisive, and those who build it must be trusted with it. Either way, power flows to the labs.
Community insights
What readers carry out of it.
Entry 01HourLife takeaway
The AI industry runs like an empire: it takes what is not its own and tells a story about saving the world to make the taking feel right.
Hao borrows the frame from the colonial empires of the 1800s. The resources have changed: people's writing and art, cheap labour, land, electricity and fresh water. The pattern has not. The point is not that the people involved are villains, but that the structure rewards taking.
Entry 02HourLife takeaway
Scale at all costs was a choice, not a law of nature.
OpenAI bet that bigger models, more data and more computing power would win, and once it moved, its rivals followed it into a race. Hao argues that this one bet, rather than anything inevitable about the technology, is what drives the hunger for data centres, chips and workers. Other ways of building AI existed, and still do.
Entry 03HourLife takeaway
A mission big enough can be used to justify almost anything.
OpenAI was founded to make sure artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity. Hao reports how that mission was later used to explain secrecy, a for-profit arm and an ever faster race. She keeps asking who is counted in that 'humanity', and who is left out of it.
Entry 04HourLife takeaway
Behind a chatbot's polite answers are people who were paid to read the worst of the internet.
Hao reports on Kenyan contract workers, hired through the outsourcing firm Sama, who sorted violent and abusive text so OpenAI could build a content filter. They were paid a few dollars an hour, and she describes the lasting harm the work did to some of them. The safety the user sees was built on someone else's exposure.
Entry 05HourLife takeaway
The industry goes where labour is cheapest, and a crisis makes labour cheap.
Hao reports how Venezuela's economic collapse pushed educated people into piece-rate data labelling on online platforms. She argues that the gap between their pay and a researcher's pay reflects how the industry values people, not some objective difference in the worth of the work.
Entry 06HourLife takeaway
The cloud is a building, and the building needs power and water.
Data centres draw electricity and fresh water, and they are often placed where local people have little say. Hao follows residents in Chile and Uruguay who organised against planned Google data centres while their regions faced drought. The costs of AI land on a map, not in the abstract.
Entry 07HourLife takeaway
Hype and fear can be two halves of the same pitch.
Hao describes a field split between people who think AGI will save us and people who fear it will end us. Both camps agree it is near and enormous, and both conclusions hand more power to the few labs building it. In her telling, that split helped set up the 2023 board crisis.
Entry 08HourLife takeaway
Controlling what the public knows is part of controlling the empire.
A company with 'open' in its name came to share less and less about its models and training data. Hao argues that when a few firms fund most research and decide what gets published, they also shape what everyone else believes about AI. OpenAI declined to take part in her book, so she built it from hundreds of interviews and documents.
Entry 09HourLife takeaway
Empires are weakened from below, by people who refuse the terms.
Hao does not ask readers to wait for a wise leader. She points to artists and writers who sue or strike, communities that demand real terms before a data centre is built, and small projects such as Te Hiku Media in New Zealand, which builds language tools with its community's consent. Power spread across the supply chain is harder to concentrate.
Action steps
Use it with your eyes open.
Set up onceThis week
1
List the AI you used this week
Write down every AI tool you touched in the last seven days, what you used it for, and whether the result was worth it. Mark the uses you would happily drop.
2
Open your chatbot's data settings
In each AI tool you use, find the setting for whether your conversations train future models, and choose deliberately. Note what the tool says it keeps and for how long.
3
Find the data centres near you
Search local news and planning records for data centre projects in your region. Note what power and water they plan to use, and when the public can comment.
4
Choose one task you keep human
Pick one kind of work you will not hand to a model, such as a letter to a friend or your first draft of an idea. Write it down so the choice is on purpose.
5
Read one report on data work
Read one long investigation into the people who label data and moderate content for AI companies. Write down one thing that surprised you.
Keep it upOngoing
6
Ask who did the work
When a product feels like magic, name one group of people whose labour made it possible. Do it out loud once a week, in a conversation or a note.
7
Use the smallest tool that works
Before you open a chatbot, ask whether a search, a template or your own memory would do. Save the big model for the jobs that need it.
8
Turn hype into a checkable claim
When you read a big AI headline, rewrite it as one claim you could check, and note who gains if you believe it. Keep a running list for a month.
9
Follow one local decision
Once a season, follow one local decision about power, water or land use: read the agenda, and send a comment or a question if you have one.
Every answer a machine gives you was paid for somewhere, by someone. Ask where, and ask who.
As an Amazon Associate, HourLife earns from qualifying purchases.
Build your mini action book.
Pick setup actions and daily habits from Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI, choose a start date, and download a printable checklist with real calendar pages.
Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI
Week 1
List the AI you used this week
Open your chatbot's data settings
Find the data centres near you
MTWTFSS
Frequently asked
What is Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI about?
Karen Hao is a journalist who has covered artificial intelligence for MIT Technology Review and The Wall Street Journal, and who profiled OpenAI years before ChatGPT made it famous. Empire of AI follows the company from its founding as a nonprofit in 2015, through the launch of ChatGPT, to the November 2023 crisis in which its board fired Sam Altman and then took him back days later. Hao argues that the industry...
What are the key takeaways from Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI?
HourLife’s key takeaways include: The AI industry runs like an empire: it takes what is not its own and tells a story about saving the world to make the taking feel right. Scale at all costs was a choice, not a law of nature. A mission big enough can be used to justify almost anything.
Who should read Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI?
It's a strong pick for readers exploring Become Hard To Manipulate, Digital Literacy, and History Worth Knowing. HourLife distills its core idea into key insights and practical actions worth trying.
What's one thing I can do after reading Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI?
List the AI you used this week — Write down every AI tool you touched in the last seven days, what you used it for, and whether the result was worth it. Mark the uses you would happily drop.
How long does it take to read the Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI summary?
About five minutes. The HourLife summary distills Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI into its core idea, 9 community insights, and 9 practical actions you can apply right away.
More from the author
Every HourLife page connected to the writer behind Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI.
One idea from one book and one small habit from another, every week or once a month, on the day and around the hour you pick, where you are. Nothing else, and one link stops it.
Downloads & shareables
Print it, pin it, post it. Ways to take Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI off the screen and into the world.
Select a number to download the PNG, or the arrow to preview it.
Turn this book into a daily practice.
Save the insights that land, build the habits that stick, and keep what you learn from Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI working long after you close the page — inside HourLife.
We would like to use Google Analytics to see which pages are worth keeping. It is off until you say yes, and the site works exactly the same either way.
How we handle your data.
Google Analytics is currently on.
We use it to see which pages are worth keeping, and nothing else. You can change that whenever you like — the site works exactly the same either way.
How we handle your data.