Gad Saad's argument, in our words: empathy is a good instrument that can be turned up too high or pointed the wrong way, and then kindness starts to cost the one who offers it. This page sets out his case as his, notes where critics push back, and gives you a tool for checking a kindness of your own.
2026published by Broadside Books
2020The Parasitic Mind, the book it follows
2ways empathy misfires: too strong, or the wrong target
HourLife's drawing of the range the book describes.
The core idea
A virtue with a dial on it.
Gad Saad is a Lebanese-born Canadian behavioural scientist who teaches marketing at Concordia University in Montreal and applies evolutionary psychology to human behaviour. In this follow-up to The Parasitic Mind, he argues that empathy is a valuable trait that does harm when it fires too strongly, at the wrong target, or without reason to check it. His name for that failure is suicidal empathy: compassion that ends up hurting the person or the society that shows it. Where his earlier book described bad ideas hijacking how people think, this one describes them hijacking how people feel. He applies the idea to political debates such as immigration, crime, homelessness and gender policy, mostly through news stories and his own experience. The book is a polemic, and many reviewers, including some who share his politics, dispute his examples and his conclusions.
Saad's starting point is uncontroversial. Empathy, he says, is what you want in a social species, as long as it stays within a sensible range. The argument begins when he asks what happens outside that range. In his account, a kindness can feel right and still leave the giver, or the people around them, worse off.
He then turns that test on public life, and this is where readers split. Supporters find a name for something they had noticed. Critics, including reviewers in Quillette and The Bulwark, say he stretches one idea over too many issues and picks the examples that fit. We set out his case as his, in our own words, and leave the politics to you.
01
Feelingemotional empathy
Sharing what another person feels. Saad treats it as valuable and fast, and as the part most easily set off by a vivid story.
02
Understandingcognitive empathy
Modelling what another person actually thinks and wants, which psychologists call theory of mind. He argues people skip it and assume others share their values.
03
Judgementreason in charge
Checking the feeling against evidence and consequences before acting on it. This is the remedy the book points to: not less empathy, but empathy that answers to reason.
Interactive · the kindness calibrator
Is your kindness in range?
Saad writes mostly about politics. His test works best close to home. Pick one kindness you are weighing: a loan, a favour, a place to stay, another chance. Say how much you want to do it, then run seven checks. The calibrator compares your pull with your reasons and suggests how to adjust the offer.
Step 1 · The kindness
Optional. It goes on the note you copy. Nothing you type leaves this browser.
Step 2 · Seven checks
Reading
Your kindness, weighed.
ColdCalibratedHot
Pull to say yes
Checks passed
Answer the pull and all seven checks to get a reading.
HourLife's tool, built on the book's idea of empathy kept in range. The checks and suggestions are ours, not the author's. It is not financial, legal or mental health advice. If you, or someone you are trying to help, are in danger, call your local emergency number.
Concept anatomy
How a kindness misfires, in Saad's account.
Our sketch of the sequence the book describes. A feeling is set off and acted on, and the step where reason should test it is skipped. The cost turns up later, often on someone who was not in the picture.
A story
A vivid case of suffering, close up and easy to picture.
A feeling
Emotional empathy fires, quickly and sincerely.
The skipped check
No one asks what the person really thinks, what the evidence says, or who else is affected.
Where it goes wrong
A choice
A personal decision, or in his political chapters a rule or policy.
A cost
It lands on the giver or on third parties, and the feeling hides it.
Two ways it misfires
In interviews about the book, Saad describes empathy going wrong when it fires too strongly, or when it is aimed at the wrong person or situation.
Too strongThe feeling overshoots the range, and the size of the response stops matching the situation.
Wrong targetThe feeling is fine, but it goes to the wrong person or case, while others with a claim are left out.
What critics say
Points made in reviews of the book, in our words. We list them so you can weigh the argument, not to settle it.
One idea stretched too far.The frame is applied to so many issues that it explains less than it seems to.
Examples chosen to fit.Single cases stand in for whole groups or policies, and the counter-cases go unmentioned.
Opponents are reasoning too.People who disagree with Saad often have arguments, not only feelings, and the book rarely engages them.
Tone over substance.Several reviewers, some sympathetic to his politics, found the asides and self-promotion got in the way of the case.
Community insights
What readers take from it.
01HourLife takeaway
Saad is not against empathy; his case is that it fails the way any good trait fails, by running too hot or aiming at the wrong target.
He describes empathy as an evolved capacity that serves a social species well within a sensible range. The trouble he names is empathy that has come loose from that range. The word suicidal in the title is a metaphor for kindness that harms the one who offers it.
02HourLife takeaway
Suicidal empathy is his name for compassion that ends up damaging the person or the society that shows it.
The test he applies is about outcomes: does the kind act leave the giver, or the group, worse off? A feeling can be sincere and still lead to a choice that backfires. You do not need to share his politics to find that distinction useful in your own life.
03HourLife takeaway
The book is a sequel to The Parasitic Mind: there, bad ideas hijack reasoning; here, they hijack feeling.
In the earlier book Saad called certain ideas parasites that disable clear thinking. Here he turns to the emotional side and argues that a strong moral feeling can switch off the questions a person would normally ask. Both books share one aim: to put evidence and reason back in charge.
04HourLife takeaway
Feeling what another person feels is not the same as understanding what they think, and Saad argues the second needs more care.
He separates the emotional side of empathy from the cognitive side, which psychologists tie to theory of mind: the ability to model what is in someone else's head. His claim is that people often assume others share their own values and fears. He calls the failure to model a different culture's values a missing cultural theory of mind.
05HourLife takeaway
A kindness should be judged by what it does, not only by how good it feels to offer.
Saad returns again and again to the gap between how a choice feels to support and what it does once it is in place. He argues that public policy is often defended by the warmth of its intentions. The same gap shows up in private life, in the loan that is never repaid or the favour that becomes a duty.
06HourLife takeaway
Every kindness has a cost, and Saad argues the cost often lands on someone who is not in the picture.
Many of his examples ask who pays when compassion for one group becomes a rule: neighbours, victims of crime, or the next generation. Critics reply that he picks the cases that suit his conclusion and that the costs he names are contested. Asking who is missing from the frame is still a useful habit for any decision.
07HourLife takeaway
Empathy flows most easily to whoever is cast as the victim, which is why Saad sees that label as so powerful in public argument.
In his account, being seen as the victim draws sympathy, so debates turn into contests over who holds that position. He applies this to arguments about crime, migration and gender. His critics note that people on every side of politics make the same move.
08HourLife takeaway
Saad writes as someone whose family fled Lebanon's civil war, and he treats an open, stable society as rare and easy to lose.
He argues that the safety and freedoms many readers take for granted are recent and fragile. That history explains the urgency of his tone. Reviewers who disagree with him say the same fear leads him to overstate the threats he describes.
09HourLife takeaway
The remedy the book points to is not less empathy but empathy with reason in charge of it.
Saad's alternative is calibration: keep the feeling, then check it against evidence, consequences and everyone the choice affects. That check works on small, personal decisions as well as public ones. It is also the part of the book that readers on different sides are most likely to share.
Action steps
Keep the warmth, add the check.
Set up once this week
01
Write down one kindness that costs you
Pick one ongoing commitment, such as a loan, a favour or a role you keep covering. On one page, write what it costs you each month and what it actually does for the other person.
02
Name the people outside the frame
Take one decision you face this week and list everyone it affects, not only the person asking. Put a star next to anyone you had not been picturing.
03
Set your limit before you're asked
Decide now how much money, time or how many second chances you can offer a friend or relative without resentment. Write the number down so the choice is made while you are calm.
04
Read one serious critic
Before you settle on what you think of this book, read one critical review and one favourable one. Write down the strongest point each makes.
05
Split a strong view into feeling and evidence
Pick a public issue you feel strongly about. Write one sentence on what you feel, one on what you believe the evidence shows, and one on where you would check it.
Keep it up every time
06
Wait a day on any big yes
When someone asks for a large favour, money or a place to stay, say you will answer tomorrow. Decide after the feeling has settled, using the checks above.
07
Ask what happens the tenth time
Before you repeat a kindness, picture doing it ten more times. If the other person would be worse off by then, change what you offer.
08
Check results once a month
On the first of the month, look back at one kindness you offered. Note whether it helped, and keep, shrink or stop it on that basis.
09
Steelman before you share
Before you post or forward something on a heated issue, write the best case for the other side in one sentence. Share only if you still think it is worth it.
Keep the warmth, and let reason decide where it goes.
As an Amazon Associate, HourLife earns from qualifying purchases.
Build your mini action book.
Pick setup actions and daily habits from Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind, choose a start date, and download a printable checklist with real calendar pages.
Gad Saad is a Lebanese-born Canadian behavioural scientist who teaches marketing at Concordia University in Montreal and applies evolutionary psychology to human behaviour. In this follow-up to The Parasitic Mind, he argues that empathy is a valuable trait that does harm when it fires too strongly, at the wrong target, or without reason to check it. His name for that failure is suicidal empathy: compassion that...
What are the key takeaways from Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind?
HourLife’s key takeaways include: Saad is not against empathy; his case is that it fails the way any good trait fails, by running too hot or aiming at the wrong target. Suicidal empathy is his name for compassion that ends up damaging the person or the society that shows it. The book is a sequel to The Parasitic Mind: there, bad ideas hijack reasoning; here, they hijack feeling.
Who should read Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind?
It's a strong pick for readers exploring Become Hard To Manipulate and Decision Making. HourLife distills its core idea into key insights and practical actions worth trying.
What's one thing I can do after reading Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind?
Write down one kindness that costs you — Pick one ongoing commitment, such as a loan, a favour or a role you keep covering. On one page, write what it costs you each month and what it actually does for the other person.
How long does it take to read the Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind summary?
About five minutes. The HourLife summary distills Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind into its core idea, 9 community insights, and 9 practical actions you can apply right away.
More from the author
Every HourLife page connected to the writer behind Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind.
One idea from one book and one small habit from another, every week or once a month, on the day and around the hour you pick, where you are. Nothing else, and one link stops it.
Downloads & shareables
Print it, pin it, post it. Ways to take Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind off the screen and into the world.
Select a number to download the PNG, or the arrow to preview it.
Turn this book into a daily practice.
Save the insights that land, build the habits that stick, and keep what you learn from Suicidal Empathy: Dying to Be Kind working long after you close the page — inside HourLife.
We would like to use Google Analytics to see which pages are worth keeping. It is off until you say yes, and the site works exactly the same either way.
How we handle your data.
Google Analytics is currently on.
We use it to see which pages are worth keeping, and nothing else. You can change that whenever you like — the site works exactly the same either way.
How we handle your data.