William Strauss and Neil Howe were American writers who studied generations, and their earlier book Generations (1991) set out the pattern this one builds on. The Fourth Turning argues that Anglo-American history moves in a cycle, the saeculum, roughly the length of a long human life. Each saeculum has four turnings of about twenty years: a High, an Awakening, an Unraveling and a Crisis, which the authors compare to spring, summer, autumn and winter. Four generational archetypes, Prophet, Nomad, Hero and Artist, age through these turnings in rotation, and the authors argue that their changing roles drive the cycle. The book traces the pattern back through English and American history, from the Wars of the Roses to the Depression and the Second World War, and forecasts that the United States would enter a new Crisis early in the twenty-first century. Many historians treat it as a provocative theory rather than established fact.
The engine is ageing. Every generation passes through four phases of life, each about twenty years long: childhood, young adulthood, midlife and elderhood. When all the living generations step up a phase together, the mood of the whole society shifts, and a new turning begins.
So the theory ties public history to private life. The era you are born into shapes how you are raised, and how you are raised shapes what you push for when your generation runs things.
A theory, not a lawMany historians criticise the saeculum as unfalsifiable or too neat, since almost any event can be fitted into some turning. Read it as a lens, and test it.