Communication · a life skill
Advanced Listening for Values
under the position, in a standoff
In a standoff, both people repeat their position a little louder each time. This level is about going underneath it: asking what each position would give you, saying their value back before your own, and building an offer that serves both.
- Challenging
- Life-Changing impact
- Learn it: 30 days
- Their value, then yours
An illustration, not data. Hover a step to see where it happens.
The method
Position, why, say it back, the shared issue, the offer.
-
Write both positions down, and stop arguing them
“It has to ship Friday.” “It can't.” Once they're written, neither of you needs to say them again.
-
Ask “what would that give you?”, then once more
The first answer is often another position. The second is usually closer to what they value.
-
Say their value back before your own
“So what matters to you is keeping our word to the client.” Wait for a yes. Then say yours.
-
Look for the issue you both want the same way
Split the standoff into issues. Some you both want, some you can trade, and only a few are a real clash.
-
Build an offer that serves both values, and name it
Say which value each part serves. An offer that only serves yours is just your position again.
Position, why, say it back, the shared issue, the offer.
Example: “So what matters to you is that the client can trust us, and what matters to me is not shipping something broken. What if the tested half goes Friday, the rest Tuesday, and we write to them today?”
Standoff ledger
Go under both positions.
1 · Pick a standoff, or write your own
Them
What it comes down to
You
What it comes down to
2 · Split it into issues
3 · The offer
4 · What to say
- Both positions written down
- A why under each
- Both values named
- Something you both want
- An offer
Nothing you type is saved or sent anywhere. Close the page and it's gone.
The research behind it
Asking finds deals that arguing misses.
Leigh Thompson, who studies negotiation, ran experiments in which pairs negotiated several issues at once. Some issues mattered more to one side than the other, so there were trades to be found. Negotiators who asked about the other side's interests, or told the other side theirs, judged the other side's priorities more accurately and reached deals that were better for both. It helped even when only one of the two did it.
Without that exchange, people tend to assume the other side wants the opposite of whatever they want. Thompson and Hrebec pooled 32 experiments on what they called the lose-lose effect: on an issue where both sides wanted the same outcome, negotiators often settled on something both liked less, because each assumed the other wanted the opposite.
That's what the why ladder and the issue list are for. They turn two positions into issues you can see, and show which of them are actually a clash.
The idea
Why it works.
A position is one answer to a problem, and two answers can rule each other out. The values under them usually don't. “Ship Friday” and “don't ship Friday” can't both happen, but “keep our word” and “don't ship something broken” can.
Saying their value back first matters because it's hard to listen while you're waiting to be heard. Once they know you've got theirs, there's room for yours.
When it goes wrong
Habits that help.
- Don't argue the position again. Each round of “it has to” and “it can't” digs both of you in deeper.
- Ask, don't diagnose. “What would that give you?” is a question. “You just want to look good to the client” is an accusation.
- Check before you build. If they don't say yes to your summary of their value, you've got it wrong. Ask again.
- Name the real clash. Some things can't be traded. Saying so plainly is better than an offer that hides it.
Go deeper
Keep going.
- Simple Listening for Values
- Deliberate Listening for Values
- Advanced Listening for Values
Keep this going in the app.
HourLife turns these ideas into a daily system — goals, habits, focus, and reflection in one private place.
