Keep this tool for later
Sign in to save
  1. Tools
  2. Mental Model Explorer

Look at a decision through more than one lens.

Write the decision as a question, and the desk suggests mental models that fit it: a pre-mortem, a consequence ladder, three cases with odds. Each lens says which way it points, and the desk shows where they agree and where they split. Then write down what you decided and how sure you were, and come back to review it.

  • 12 mental models
  • 8 worked examples
  • Free, no account

How it works

Ask the question, look at it several ways, then keep a record you can check later. All on one screen, saved as you go.

Ask the question

Write the decision as a question, pick what kind it is, and say how hard it would be to undo. The desk suggests the lenses that fit, and says why it picked each one.

Look through the lenses

Each lens is a short worksheet: reasons it failed with a guard for each, what happens next and after that, three cases with odds. Each one ends with which way it points, and the desk reads them together.

Decide, then review

Write what you decided, what you expect, how sure you are and your first step. The desk sets a review date from the stakes, and on the day asks how it turned out and whether it was a good call.

12 lenses in 4 groups

Each one looks at something the others miss, and each names its own blind spot. The worksheet a lens opens is shaped to its question.

  • See the risk3 lenses

    • Inversion Pre-mortem

      Imagine it has already gone wrong, and work out why.

      Charlie Munger, after Carl Jacobi, and Gary Klein’s pre-mortem (2007)

    • Probabilistic thinking Three cases

      Treat the decision as a bet, with odds on each outcome.

      Annie Duke, Thinking in Bets (2018)

    • Margin of safety Needs against slack

      Leave room for things to go worse than planned.

      Benjamin Graham, The Intelligent Investor (1949)

  • Count the cost3 lenses

    • Opportunity cost Three questions

      Every yes is a no to something else.

      Friedrich von Wieser named it in 1914; Greg McKeown’s Essentialism (2014) applies it to a life

    • Sunk cost Three questions

      What you have already spent is gone either way.

      Hal Arkes and Catherine Blumer, The Psychology of Sunk Cost (1985)

    • Value equation Four levers

      Value rises with the outcome and its odds, and falls with the wait and the effort.

      Alex Hormozi, $100M Offers (2021)

  • Look ahead3 lenses

    • Second-order thinking Consequence ladder

      Ask “and then what?” more than once.

      Howard Marks, The Most Important Thing (2011)

    • Explore vs exploit Three questions

      Try something new, or double down on what works?

      Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths, Algorithms to Live By (2016)

    • Systems vs goals Three questions

      The goal sets the direction; the routine gets you there.

      James Clear, Atomic Habits (2018)

  • Know your part3 lenses

    • Circle of control Three rings

      Sort what you control from what you can only influence or must accept.

      Epictetus, the Enchiridion, and Stephen Covey, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (1989)

    • Identity-based habits Three questions

      Choose by who you want to become, not only by the result.

      James Clear, Atomic Habits (2018)

    • Attention economy Three questions

      Your attention is limited, and plenty of things are built to take it.

      Herbert Simon (1971)

Keep going

Four of the lenses have a longer guide of their own, and the dungeon tests how fast you spot which model a problem needs.

Where they agree, where they split, and what you decided

Once you know how it turned out, it is hard to remember what you knew when you chose. Writing it down first is the only fair way to look back.

Where the lenses point · Should I take the job offer in Lisbon?

The lenses disagree

2 for and 1 against. Before you decide, look again at Inversion.

For it2

Second-order thinking Staying is easy now and costly later. Going is the other way round.
Opportunity cost The best alternative is a maybe. This one is a yes on the table.

Unsure1

Margin of safety Two of the three buffers are short. Ask for a later start.

Against it1

Inversion Three ways it fails, and I can guard against only one of them today. The smaller side

When they split, look at the smaller side

Lenses that look at different things and still agree are worth more than one lens that is very sure. When they split, the desk names the lenses on the smaller side, because that is usually where the unresolved part is.

The decision

What I decided
Say yes if they move the start to March and pay for the move
What I expect to happen
A hard first winter, then a role I am glad I took
How sure I am
65%
First step
Email the recruiter about the start date and the move
Review on
Thu, January 28, 2027in 90 days

Confidence you can check

Each decision records how sure you were. Once three are reviewed, the desk compares the confidence you wrote with how things turned out, so you learn whether your 80 percent means 80 percent.

Review

On Thu, January 28, 2027, the desk asks two things.

How it turned out
Better than I expectedAbout as I expectedWorse than I expected
Was it a good call?
A good call, given what I knewPartlyWith the same facts, I would decide differently

Two questions, kept apart

Annie Duke calls judging a decision by its outcome resulting. A good call can turn out badly, and a bad one can get lucky, so the review asks how it turned out and, separately, whether it was a good call given what you knew.

More than one lens, on purpose

One model makes every problem look like the one it was built for. A few, used together, catch what each would miss.

A latticework, not a hammer

Charlie Munger’s advice was to carry a few dozen models from different fields and hang your experience on them. “To the man with only a hammer, every problem looks pretty much like a nail.” The desk keeps to twelve, so each one is something you would actually reach for.

More lenses for a one-way door

Jeff Bezos sorts decisions into two-way doors, which you can walk back through, and one-way doors, which you cannot. The desk asks for more lenses and a later review the harder a decision is to undo.

How many lenses a decision deserves

  • Easy to undo2 lenses · review in 30 days

    A two-way door. If it goes wrong you can walk back through, so decide quickly.

  • Costly to undo3 lenses · review in 60 days

    You could reverse it, but it would cost time, money or goodwill.

  • Can't undo4 lenses · review in 90 days

    A one-way door. Slow down and look through more lenses before you go.

What it is built on

Six sources, used for what they show and no more. Each lens names its own in the desk.

  • A latticework of models Charlie Munger, “A Lesson on Elementary, Worldly Wisdom”, USC Business School, 1994

    Carry the big ideas from many disciplines and use them together, because a single model distorts what you see. The desk’s twelve come from economics, investing, psychology and philosophy.

  • The pre-mortem Gary Klein, “Performing a Project Premortem”, Harvard Business Review, September 2007

    Imagine the project has failed and write down why. Assuming the failure, rather than asking what might go wrong, makes it easier to name real risks. The inversion lens works this way.

  • Decisions as bets Annie Duke, Thinking in Bets, 2018

    Treat a decision as a bet on one of several futures, and judge it by what you knew rather than by how it turned out. The three cases and the two review questions come from here.

  • One-way and two-way doors Jeff Bezos, letter to Amazon shareholders, 2015

    Some decisions are consequential and nearly irreversible, and deserve care; most can be changed, and should be made quickly. The desk’s three stakes and the lenses each asks for follow that split.

  • The margin of safety Benjamin Graham, The Intelligent Investor, 1949

    Leave room between what a plan needs and what you have, so a bad turn does not sink it. The buffers worksheet sets each need against what you have and shows the gap.

  • The pull of money already spent H. R. Arkes and C. Blumer, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35, 1985

    In their experiments, people who had paid more for something kept using it, even when an alternative was better. The sunk cost lens asks you to decide from here forward.

Questions

  • What is a mental model?

    A mental model is a simplified idea of how something works that you can carry from one problem to another. Opportunity cost, second-order effects and the margin of safety are examples. Charlie Munger argued that a few dozen of them, drawn from different fields and used together, beat expertise in any one.

  • How does the Thinking Desk work?

    You write the decision as a question, say what kind of decision it is and how hard it would be to undo. The desk suggests lenses that fit. Each lens is a short worksheet, a pre-mortem, a consequence ladder, three cases with odds and so on, and it ends with which way that lens points. When you are ready, you write down what you decided, what you expect and how sure you are, and set a date to look back.

  • Which model should I use?

    Start with the suggestions. They come from the kind of decision, the words in your question and how hard it is to undo, and each says why it was picked. A decision you cannot reverse always gets inversion and the margin of safety near the top. You can add any of the twelve at any time.

  • How many lenses does one decision need?

    It depends on how hard it is to undo. Jeff Bezos split decisions into two-way doors, which you can walk back through, and one-way doors, which you cannot. The desk asks for two lenses on a decision that is easy to undo, three on one that is costly to undo and four on one you cannot undo, and says when you have fewer.

  • What does it mean when the lenses disagree?

    That the decision is not as clear as it felt, which is the point of using more than one. When lenses that look at different things point the same way, you can be more confident. When they split, the desk names the lenses on the smaller side, because that is where the thing you have not resolved usually is.

  • Why write down my confidence and a review date?

    Because memory rewrites decisions once the outcome is known. Annie Duke calls judging a decision by how it turned out resulting. Writing down what you expected and how sure you were lets you look back fairly. The review asks two separate questions, how it turned out and whether it was a good call given what you knew, and over time the desk compares your confidence with your results.

  • Is this advice?

    No. The desk asks questions and keeps your answers in order; it does not know your situation and does not tell you what to do. For a decision with legal, medical or financial consequences, talk to someone qualified as well.

  • Where are my decisions saved?

    In this browser, as you type, and nowhere else unless you are signed in, in which case they are also saved to your account so they follow you to another device. You can copy a decision as text or download it as Markdown.

Give the next decision a second look

Your decisions are saved in this browser as you go, and to your account if you are signed in. Nothing you write is shown to anyone else.

Keep this going in the app.

HourLife turns these ideas into a daily system — goals, habits, focus, and reflection in one private place.